{{flagHref}}
Products
  • Products
  • Categories
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Application
  • Document
|
/ {{languageFlag}}
Select language
Stanford Advanced Materials {{item.label}}
Stanford Advanced Materials
Select language
Stanford Advanced Materials {{item.label}}
a

Comparing the climate and air pollution footprints of Lithium-ion BEVs and ICEs in the UK incorporating systemic energy system responses

Title Comparing the climate and air pollution footprints of Lithium-ion BEVs and ICEs in the UK incorporating systemic energy system responses
Authors Pankaj Sadavarte, Drew Shindell, Daniel Loughlin
Magazine PLOS Climate
Date 10/29/2025
DOI 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000714
Introduction Addressing escalating travel demand and the critical environmental issues from fossil fuel vehicles necessitates a shift towards cleaner energy. Lithium-ion battery electric vehicles (BEVs) emit no operational emissions but increase electricity use, impacting power generation emissions. A discussion persists regarding the complete lifecycle emissions of lithium-ion batteries versus fossil fuels. To clarify these aspects, this study utilises the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM) integrated assessment model (IAM) to quantify air pollutants and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions across four US BEV adoption scenarios. The analysis covers emissions from fuel and battery production, vehicle manufacturing, and vehicle operation for both BEVs and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. Findings reveal that each additional kWh of lithium-ion battery output reduces CO2 emissions by an average of 220 kg in 2030 and 127 kg in 2050. Significant reductions in CO emissions are also observed, with minor changes in SO2 and NOx. A life cycle assessment shows BEV-associated CO2 emissions are 30% higher than ICE vehicles for the initial two years, but BEVs subsequently achieve lower cumulative CO2 emissions. Considering air pollution and climate change impacts, the economic cost of damages from ICEs is presently 2 to 3.5 times greater than BEVs over their lifespan, a ratio projected to grow as the electricity sector's emissions intensity declines.
Quote Pankaj Sadavarte, Drew Shindell and Daniel Loughlin. Comparing the climate and air pollution footprints of Lithium-ion BEVs and ICEs in the UK incorporating systemic energy system responses. PLOS Clim. 2025. Vol. 4(10):e0000714. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pclm.0000714
Element Lithium (Li) , Carbon (C) , Oxygen (O) , Sulfur (S) , Nitrogen (N)
Industry Automotive , Energy Storage & Batteries
Related papers
Loading... Please wait...
Publish your research and articles on the SAM website
Disclaimer
This site only provides metadata for academic works to enable users to easily find relevant information. For full access to the works, please use the DOI to visit the original publisher's website. The data comes from publicly accessible scientific databases and complies with the terms of use of these platforms. If you have any concerns regarding copyright, please contact us. We will address them immediately.

Success! You are now subscribed.

You have successfully subscribed! Check your inbox soon to receive great emails from this sender.
Leave A Message
Leave A Message
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
* Product Name:
* Your Phone:
* Comments: