{{flagHref}}
Products
  • Products
  • Categories
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Application
  • Document
|
/ {{languageFlag}}
Select language
Stanford Advanced Materials {{item.label}}
Stanford Advanced Materials
Select language
Stanford Advanced Materials {{item.label}}

Sodium Hyaluronate Production Methods: Bacteria Fermentation Or Rooster’s Crowns?

Introduction

Natriumhyaluronat, the salt form of hyaluronic acid, is a naturally occurring polysaccharide. This material is present in the vitreous humour, dermis, synovial fluid and other parts of the human body, where it retains moisture and provides cushioning. In scientific and clinical applications it is used to improve skin moisture, skin structure and overall appearance.

There exist two primary methods for producing Natriumhyaluronat, namely production from bacterial fermentation and extraction from rooster combs. In this article we detail these two methods and describe their respective advantages and disadvantages. We aim that readers gain a clearer understanding and may select the appropriate Natriumhyaluronat product for their research or enterprise.

Figure 1. Chemical structure of HA

Production from Bacterial Fermentation

--The Fermentation Process

Bacterial fermentation is a widely used method for producing Natriumhyaluronat. In this method, bacterial strains such as Streptococcus equi or Streptococcus zooepidemicus are cultivated in a nutrient-rich medium. During their growth, the bacteria produce Natriumhyaluronat, which is then extracted and purified.

The microbial fermentation process is divided into the following steps:

  1. Initial product: Following fermentation, the bacteria are inactivated and the raw HA is precipitated using an organic solvent.
  2. Purification: The raw product is immersed in saline and further purified.
  3. Final product: The solution is subsequently precipitated with an organic solvent and dried to obtain the final HA product.

[2]

Figure 2. Production methods for Natriumhyaluronat

Further reading: Is hyaluronic acid extracted from animals?

--Advantages of Bacterial Fermentation

The fermentation method provides several advantages.

  • Better customisation: One significant advantage is the ability to adjust the Natriumhyaluronat product to specified requirements. By modifying fermentation conditions, such as pH, temperature and nutrient composition, the molecular weight and viscosity can be tailored to precise specifications.
  • Increased efficiency: Bacterial fermentation utilises nutrients effectively, thereby reducing production costs. The method also yields higher extraction rates, as cellulases and other enzymes facilitate cell disruption and HA extraction.
  • Enhanced purity: The resulting Natriumhyaluronat exhibits a high level of purity. Smaller molecules, such as polypeptides and polysaccharides in nanometre sizes, are produced and are easily absorbed.
  • Environmentally ethical: This production process provides a reliable supply of Natriumhyaluronat. Unlike animal-derived sources, no animals are used, thereby observing ethical and sustainable practices.

Further reading: How is the HA content analysed in the fermentation broth?

Extraction from Rooster Combs

--The Extraction Process

Rooster combs are another natural source for Natriumhyaluronat. The combs contain connective tissue with a high concentration of the substance.

This extraction method was initially applied for laboratory investigations. It was subsequently abandoned due to a low extraction yield, high costs and procedural complexity.

--Disadvantages of Extraction from Animal Tissues

Extracting Natriumhyaluronat from rooster combs yields a relatively high output. The combs are readily available and can be harvested without causing harm to the rooster.

However, this preparation method has several disadvantages.

  • A primary concern is the potential transmission of diseases, such as Avian influenza, from the animal to humans.
  • Another disadvantage is the degradation of Natriumhyaluronat. Enzymes present in animal tissues may break down the polymer chains during extraction.
  • Furthermore, the use of animal-derived Natriumhyaluronat is inappropriate for individuals with specific dietary requirements, such as vegans and vegetarians.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both bacterial fermentation and extraction from rooster combs offer distinct advantages and disadvantages. The choice of production method depends on the product’s requirements and the manufacturer’s ethical considerations. By selecting an appropriate source and adjusting the production process, healthcare professionals and consumers can benefit from the effective properties of this polysaccharide.

Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM) supplies high-purity Natriumhyaluronat in the USA. A range of Natriumhyaluronat is available in medical, cosmetic, food and injection grades. The product is produced without animal testing, and is both vegan and kosher. Please contact us if you require further details.

Reference:

[1] Carmen G. Boeriu, Jan Springer, Floor K. Kooy, Lambertus A. M. van den Broek, Gerrit Eggink, "Production Methods for Hyaluronan", International Journal of Carbohydrate Chemistry, vol. 2013, Article ID 624967, 14 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/624967

About the author

Chin Trento

Chin Trento holds a bachelor's degree in applied chemistry from the University of Illinois. His educational background gives him a broad base from which to approach many topics. He has been working with writing advanced materials for over four years at Stanford Advanced Materials (SAM). His main purpose in writing these articles is to provide a free, yet quality resource for readers. He welcomes feedback on typos, errors, or differences in opinion that readers come across.

REVIEWS
{{viewsNumber}} Thoughts on "{{blogTitle}}"
{{item.created_at}}

{{item.content}}

blog.levelAReply (Cancle reply)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*

Comment*
Name *
Email *
{{item.children[0].created_at}}

{{item.children[0].content}}

{{item.created_at}}

{{item.content}}

blog.MoreReplies

LEAVE A REPLY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*

Comment*
Name *
Email *

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER

* Your Name
* Your Email
Success! You are now subscribed.
You have successfully subscribed! Check your inbox soon to receive great emails from this sender.

Related news & articles

MORE >>
Introduction to Diamond Wafers: Monocrystalline vs Polycrystalline

Currently, diamond wafers are widely used in high-tech industries because of their exceptional hardness and unique properties for electronic, optical, and even cutting and polishing purposes. In particular, diamond wafers are valued for their significant resistance to extreme conditions such as high temperatures and intense mechanical stress. The most popular types of diamond wafers are monocrystalline and polycrystalline; both types have distinct features and advantages in specific applications.

LEARN MORE >
The Most Common Polymer Plastic Selection Options: PP vs PE

PE and PP have established a complementary performance profile with distinct application domains in high-end industrial sectors, owing to their unique molecular structures and modifiable potential.

LEARN MORE >
Discussion on Modification Methods for Several Polymer Composites

This review has systematically examined four cornerstone methodologies: blending for property compatibility, filling for functional and economic adjustment, reinforcement for significant mechanical enhancement, and surface modification for precision interface engineering.

LEARN MORE >
Leave A Message
Leave A Message
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
* Product Name:
* Your Phone:
* Comments: